TheUKhas reaffirmed itssovereignty over the Falkland Islandsafter a memo leaked from Washington indicated that the US could withdraw its support.
A leaked internal Pentagon email suggested Washington could review its position on Britain’s claim to the islands as part of a wider punishment for Nato alliesnot showing support for the US war in Iran.
US president Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised Nato for a lack of support since he launched his offensive in the Middle East, threatening to withdraw altogether as he branded the alliance a “paper tiger”.
The confidential memo, which also considers suspending Spain from the alliance, floats the idea of reassessing Washington’s diplomatic support for European “imperial possessions”, such as theFalklands.
A spokesperson for British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer reaffirmed the UK’ssovereigntyover the islands: “We could not be clearer about the UK’s position on the Falkland Islands. It is long-standing, it is unchanged.
“Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islands’ right to self-determination is paramount. It’s been our consistent position and will remain the case,” the spokesperson said, adding that Britain had expressed that position “clearly and consistently to successive US administrations”.
More than 3,600 people reside in the Falkland Islands, a small archipelago in the South Atlantic, per the 2021 census.Argentinainvaded and occupied the the islands for 10 weeks in 1982 after long-running negotiations with Great Britain collapsed over their ownership. The Reagan administration publicly supported Britain through the conflict.
Experts have toldThe Independentthat losing US support for British sovereigntywould have no impact in practical terms.
Admiral Lord West of Spithead – the commanding officer of HMSArdent, a frigate that was sunk in theFalklands War– said that militarily, losing US support for British sovereignty would have “no impact”.
“The recognition or otherwise by the US does not make the islands less secure,” the former Royal Navy commander-in-chief added.
Philip Ingram MBE, a former army colonel, toldThe Independentthat Washington’s withdrawal of support could not undermine international law – and the will of the Falkland citizens.
“Under international law the fate of the Falklands is down to the will of its people, no matter what Trump says – so their sovereignty is not under any threat,” he said.
“Argentina is many, many years off developing a capability that could threaten the Falklands and the small force the UK has there could be reinforced quickly even given the pressures on our armed forces. This is simply Trump clickbaiting and nothing else.”
A senior research fellow from RUSI, Dr Carlos Solar, added that the memo was more indicative of a breakdown in the “special relationship” than an active threat.
Advertisement
"The idea of the US not supporting British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands does not add much to the issue itself, but rather it speaks badly about how the ‘special relationship’ is being handled and what Washington is willing to put in the negotiating table when asking for more UK support towards American geopolitical ambitions,” he said.
“There is no active military threat from Argentina nor there is an adversarial position from the UK towards Buenos Aires from their military personnel stationed in the Falkland Islands. The Argentine claim will be perpetual and shouldn’t surprise the British public opinion every time someone puts it on the table. Both countries, though have taken measures to improve their bilateral matters such as in trade, science, industry, and education, despite their totally unshakable positions to the sovereignty question."
Questions have amped up around UK sovereignty over the Falklands since Argentine president Javier Milei took office in 2023. The populist leader, who has a strong relationship with the US president, has repeatedly claimed Argentine sovereignty over the islands.
President Milei said earlier this month: “I wish to reaffirm our right to the full exercise of sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia, and the South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime spaces,” according to South Atlantic news agencyMercoPress.
Residents of the Falklands Islands voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory during a sovereignty referendum in 2013.
Of 1,517 votes cast in the two-day referendum – on a turnout of more than 90 per cent – just three votes were against.
In a speech marking the 44th anniversary of the 1982 conflict, President Milei said that the war “did not alter the legal nature of this dispute, which continues to be recognised by the United Nations as a special and particular colonial situation that must be resolved through mature and sincere dialogue between Argentina and the United Kingdom”.
Dr Solar added: “Relations between the US and Argentina are at a peak which serves well both countries in the short term. Argentina gets financial aid support, and Washington secures a partner in southern tip of the Western Hemisphere, a strategic gateway between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and with access to Antarctica, much sought after by the US’s adversaries such as China.”
A total of 255 British Armed Forces personnel and 649 Argentine military personnel were killed during the Falklands War, which ended after 74 days when Argentina surrendered control back to Britain. Argentina has still not been able to rebuild its navy.
The Falkland Islands have been underBritish administration since 1833, but Argentina has long disputed this claim. The islands were believed to have been uninhabited prior to European discovery in the 17th century.
In 1765, British captain John Byron claimed the islands for Britain. Various French, British, Spanish and Argentine settlements existed on the islands prior to the UK re-establishing its sovereignty.
While it appears that Washington’s potential threat could have no real impact on the sovereignty of the Falklands, it does indicate a further deterioration in relations between the UK and the US.
President Trump said on Thursday that King Charles’s state trip at the end of this month could help repair strained relations after criticising Sir Keir Starmer as weak and indecisive.
Asked about his intervention and whether the pair can fix their relationship, Mr Trump said: “If he opened the North Sea and if his immigration policies became strong, which right now they’re not, he can recover, but if he doesn’t, I don’t think he has a chance.”
